Custom Search

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Frog and the Turtle

A frog in a shallow well says to a turtle from the eastern sea: "How happy I am! Sometimes I jump into the well; at other times I rest on a broken brick inside. When I swim, the water in the well comes up under my arms and supports my chin; when I leap, the mud covers my feet. I look around and see that none of those insects, crabs, or tadpoles are better off than me. Besides, I alone have the whole well, the whole pleasure of the well. This is the highest plane in life! Why don't you often come here to visit and broaden your horizon?"
The turtle accepts the invitation. He lowers his right leg into the well. But before he can put his left leg in, he realizes the well is too small and has to give up. then the turtle tells the frog in the well about the sea. "The long distance of ten thousand li is not enough to describe the greatness of the sea; eight thousand inches is not enough to describe its depth. During the Dayu period, there were floods for nine out of ten years, yet the sea didn't rise. During the reign of Emperor Tang in the Shang dynasty, there were droughts for seven out of eight years, yet the sea didn't fall. The sea will not change over time and will not rise or fall because of floods or drought. It is the joy of living in the Eastern Sea!"
Upon hearing this, the frog is truly surprised. It then feels disappointed and lost for a long time.

--Zhuang Zi, Chinese philosopher, fourth century B.C.

(extract from Lijia Zhang's "Socialism is Great")

Identity and Progress

INDEPENDENCE BROUGHT about a split in the gigantic sub-continental landscape, giving birth to India and Pakistan. The demand of separate nations was raised long before Independence and the political stalwarts missed no chance to get their piece of territory to rule. The Sri Ram Centre auditorium at Mandi House witnessed an introspective stroll over the history lane, on February 18, 2009.

Saaye Hamsaaye takes one on a journey, which starts with Asghar and Asghari, a Muslim couple who along with their family friend, Pathak, are highly involved in the freedom struggle and their effort to lay the foundation of a progressive society. That period saw a forced migration of the people across the border drawn between the two newly born nations, India and Pakistan. Communities were alerted to seek a safe refuge in the specific nations as per their religious identity.

In India, members of several Muslim families stayed back as they were emotionally tied to the land where they were born. Eventually, with the growth of right-wing groups in India, a new social situation emerged where marginalisation of communities other than the majority became the norm.

This play grows with the family of Asghar and Asghari and Pathak as the key integrators of the society. Asghar’s kids grow up in independent India and follow ideologies, which they believe in. Everything shatters when the ‘Babri Mosque demolition’ takes place. Asghar’s son, Anwar falls prey to the situation and his political aspirations take a different course, which is based on hate.

This could be an experience of several such Anwars and families as Asghar’s. The play grows gradually in the same fashion as did the Indian nation. All the major milestones come in front of the audience making them feel the historical progress of India. An apt effort of symbolising the socio-political development in India, since Independence, through dramatic situations has been made in the play.

Performance wise, the presentation stands no less than a top quality drama. Asghar, Asghari, Pathak, Abida, Anwar and Sarwar lead the audience to a walk down the memory lane, in a very introspective manner.


The storyline is good but the script went little loose as it was claimed by the director that the character of Asghari, the wife of Asghar a political activist, represented the system and at a point when she disappears while seeking refuge at their family friend Pathak's house. That signifies the chaos in the system. Her purpose in the play was to keep her family and friends integrated without getting affected by right wing's separatist motives; she did not want her family to run blindly on the religious fundamentalism which could nurture a sense of otherness in them nor she was open to the idea of all Muslims aligning with any other nation due to their Islamic identity.

At every point in the play, the marginalisation of the community has been shown as the cause behind the suffering of the community which takes the entire community on a ride.

Indian Films at the Academy Awards

     

Year

Film

Language

Director

1957

Mother India

Hindi

Mahbbob Khan

1962

Sahib Bibi aur Ghulam

Hindi

Abrar Alvi

1969

Deiva Magan

Tamil

Kiran K.Chenna

1971

Reshma aur Shera

Hindi

Sunil Dutt

1972

Uphaar

Hindi

Sudhendu Roy

1973

Saudagar

Hindi

Sudhendu Roy

1974

Garam Hawa

Hindi

M.S.Sathyu

1977

Manthan

Hindi

Shyam Benegal

1978

Shatranj ke Khiladi

Hindi

Satyajit Ray

1980

Payal ki Jhankar

Hindi

Satyen Bose

1984

Saaransh

Hindi

Mahesh Bhatt

1985

Saagar

Hindi

Ramesh Sippy

1986

Swathi Muthayam

Telugu

K.Vishwanath

1987

Nayagan

Tamil

Mani Ratnam

1988

Salaam Bombay

Hindi

Mira Nair

1989

Parinda

Hindi

V.V.Chopra

1990

Anjali

Tamil

Mani Ratnam

1991

Heena

Hindi

Randhir Kapoor

1992

Thevar Magan

Tamil

Bharathan

1993

Rudaali

Hindi

Kalpana Lajmi

1994

Bandit Queen

Hindi

Shekhar Kapoor

1995

Kuruthipunal

Tamil

P.C.Sreeram

1996

Indian

Tamil

S.Shankar

1997

Guru

Malyalam

Rajiv Anchal

1998

Jeans

Tamil

S.Shankar

1999

Earth

Hindi

Deepa Mehta

2000

Hey Ram

Tamil / Hindi

Kamal Haasan

2001

Lagaan

Hindi

Asutosh Gowariker

2002

Devdas

Hindi

Sanjay L.Bhansali

2004

Shwaas

Marathi

Sandeep Sawant

2005

Paheli

Hindi

Amol Palekar

2006

Rang de Basanti

Hindi

Rakeysh O.Mehra

2007

Eklavya – The Royal Guard

Hindi

V.V.Chopra

2008

Taare Zameen Par

Hindi

Aamir Khan

 

In the romance with the Golden Statue…


Slumdog Millionaire reaches a speculated finish at the 81st AcademyAward. Eight awards for the film is a miraculous win. Rahman winning the Golden Globe, and the film’s performance at BAFTA had created the intuition for the film to be winning at least under this category of Original Composition at the Academy Awards function. And now the film has bagged eight awards, giving three to its Indian contributors.

All the newspapers of this morning are cloloured with the stories of this historical win. Big mouthed critics and indifferent personalities are left with no other way than praising the moment. Above all celebrations at Dharavi is remarkable and worth joining. At least our beauty is admired outside.

Slumdog Millionaire becomes the second overseas film, after Gandhi to perform excellently at the Academy Awards function. To be correct Gandhi was an Indo-Overseas production. Even that film shared victory with Bhany Athaiya, an Indian costume designer of the film. Moreover, even Gandhi won Golden Globe and BAFTA, the same year before winning eight Academy awards.

Indian themes have the potential of being admired and appreciated. Unfortunately non of the Indian creators of cinema in India, other than Mahboob Khan (Mother India), Satyajit Ray (Satranj ke Khiladi), Mira Nair (Salaam Bombay) and Asutosh Gowariker (Lagaan) made their presence felt at the Academy Awards function.

(All the films mentioned above were nominated for Oscar)

Writer tributes...

All the songs that Guru Dutt, the great experimentalist in the history of Indian cinema, shot in his films narrate his biography. His biggest creative support and the most trusted writer of his films, Abrar Alvi narrates the story of Guru Dutt in the book 'Ten Years with Guru Dutt: Abrar Alvi's Journey'.
The book contains a conscious account of Abrar's experience with Guru Dutt, the introducer of cinemascope in India. He recalls about guru Dutt that the man carried an extraordinary sense to catch a talent and overwhelm it to the extravagant level of his trust. And the history has witnessed the result of this trust in the form of Aar Paar, Mr. and Mrs. 55, Pyaasa, Kagaz ke Phool, Chaudahvin ka Chand and Sahib Bibi aur Ghulam.
Abrar considers his ten years of association with this cinema stalwart as the most creative years of his life. He explains the nature of guru Dutt and his uncompromising endeavours, which of course did not pay him at the very instance but placed him to the unforgotable height in world of cinema. Abrar makes an effort to break all the popular tales of Guru Dutt's romance and tries to bing the notice of the reader to his plain, naive and creative thought process.
The book has been compiled by Sathya Saran, the editor of the DNA supplement Me.

On Darshan do Ghanshyam…

I doubt whether Danny Boyle could have ever known about Surdas before Slumdog Millionaire, which (the film) I think is his perception of India. Plurality which is an essence of the Indian culture and society has undergone severe blows in the past that has enriched the western perception that flows from the film.

Now coming to the film's particular song Darshan do Ghanshyam, the filmmaker has opted for the song in order to strengthen his script and the character of Jamal who is pushed into begging after he is orphaned in an ethnic mishap, which could have taken place around the time of Babri Masjid demolition, as suggested through the reference of the time period in the film, where Jamal, a Muslim kid comes to know about Ram when he sees the symbol of a bow and arrow (indicating towards the Hindu right wing aggression).

Similarly a bhajan as Darshan do Ghanshyam is being identified with the trade of begging, in the film, which is an integral part of an amputee who begs on streets, trains or buses around us. The two things which have been marked in the film show our position. It shows that how ignorant we are regarding our own things.

It does not matter whether the lyrics have been created by Gopal Singh Nepali or Surdas. The most important thing is that none of us thought about the creator of Darshan do Ghanshyam. We accepted Surdas, as shown in the film, as the creator of this bhajan. Many of us could have studied Hindi as far as University level. In spite of this nobody could notice the mistake until the son of the noted Hindi poet Gopal Singh Nepali, raised the issue.

Indian cinema, a new face



Recently Academy award was declared and was awaited impatiently by the world audience. This academy award was of more important to the Indian audience. Reason was Water, the only nomination from an Indian film maker. No matter the film was produced in Canada due to certain unprogressive reasons, but participation from the part of an Indian filmmaker suggests a completely different story. This nomination indicates towards the urge of progressive film making in India without any aesthetic dispute.
In recent few years participation by Indian films in academy award has increased. Film makers have started overcoming the cliché of “audience preference”. Can this be viewed as a progressive step by Indian film industry? Let us check every possible attitude of Indian film industry.
The charisma of Oscar has been affecting the world cinema, since long. Indian cinema can not remain untouched, in this respect. In fact with Mehoob Khan and Satyajit Ray, the ambitious journey towards Oscar began. Later it became a parameter of quality evaluation of film making.
The new millennium has come up with a new hope for the Indian cinema. Young and vibrant film makers like Asutosh Gowariker seem to be highly promising. With this generation of film makers, Indian film industry displays a new confidence in film trade. At the beginning of the millennium itself, Gowariker’s Lagaan, successfully landed to the Oscar. No matter, it did not succeed in convincing critics, but energized Indian film makers with confidence to build stories which are different from the Bollywood cliché.
Recent films display a fresh approach towards film making, in Indian context. These films including Lagaan and Rang de Basanti did not gather critical acclaim, but were worthy enough to e noticed. After all this generation of film makers are trying to come out of the passive phase of Indian cinema when atrocious creations were made in the name of “Audience ki Pasand.” At least these films have provoking elements which break the above cliché.
Of course Water remains outstanding in this chronology. Water was the real competitor in the previous academy awards, in its category. Had Water released from the country itself, pride of the Indian film industry could have surely gone high. This aspect of expression through a creative medium and its acceptance becomes another issue with a particular socio-cultural system. It was all due to the Hindu right wing aggression that this film failed to be completed on Indian soil, and the Indian selectors remained deprived of the opportunity of sending a film like Water to the Oscar.
Despite, all these examples are laden with good techniques and bold narratives. This is appositive development in the Indian film making. This is for the first time in the history of Indian film industry that three films were sent to the Oscar in one decade except Water, since it got entry from Canada.
At the end of the day “success counts the sweetest”. This proverb stands firmly with the success of these films. In fact the domestic audience has learnt to appreciate a well woven story. Altogether this could be interpreted as a positive development in Indian film making.

passive viewers and cinema

Cinema has become the most important part of entertainment. It fascinates the young and the old through moving scenes and figures, which resemble living scenes. The effect of cinema on viewers depends on how shots are interpreted by them. Further, magic of cinema is created not only by a film maker but also by the viewer. This collaboration of film makers and viewers has resulted in the decline of the quality of the film making in India. Film makers produce illogical and atrocious films in the name of entertainment and claim that viewers like such movies, and that is why such films are produced. They are not wrong. Viewers' approval and acceptance is there in the success of such atrocious films. Such film makers are encouraged by the passive behaviour of audience.